Apify alternatives
Free, self-hosted tools for screenshots and web scraping — no cloud credits required.
What Apify does
Apify is a cloud platform for running web scraping and automation tasks called “Actors.” Actors are serverless functions that run on Apify's infrastructure — you write the scraping logic (or use a pre-built Actor from the Apify Store), schedule it, and Apify handles the compute, proxy rotation, storage, and result datasets. It's a managed environment for production-scale crawling that would otherwise require significant infrastructure work.
Apify also maintains Crawlee, the open-source scraping framework (Apache-2.0), which runs locally without any Apify dependency. Crawlee and the Apify platform are distinct — Crawlee is a library, Apify is the managed cloud.
Apify pricing: two layers
Apify's pricing has two cost layers that combine:
- Platform fee — a monthly subscription ($49–$199/mo) that includes a matching dollar amount of prepaid platform credits (Compute Units)
- Per-Actor compute— each Actor run consumes Compute Units based on CPU, memory, and duration. Headless Chrome Actors (the kind that take screenshots) consume 10–20× more than lightweight HTTP Actors due to Chromium's resource usage. Many Store Actors also charge a rental fee on top of compute.
At the free tier, Apify provides $5 in platform credits per month — enough for light experimentation with non-headless Actors, but quickly exhausted by screenshot workloads that run Chromium.
Where Apify falls short for screenshot use cases
- Cannot be self-hosted — the Apify platform is cloud-only. There is no Docker image or on-premises option for the full platform.
- Two-layer cost structure — platform fee plus per-run compute makes cost unpredictable at variable screenshot volumes. A spike in screenshot requests can exhaust credits mid-month.
- Cannot reach private URLs— Apify Actors run on Apify's servers. They cannot access localhost, internal networks, VPN-protected staging environments, or any URL not reachable from the public internet.
- Your data goes through Apify — rendered HTML and screenshots are processed on Apify infrastructure. For internal documents, customer data, or authenticated pages, this is a data privacy problem.
- Overkill for simple screenshot pipelines— Apify's value is in large-scale crawling with scheduling, datasets, and team collaboration. If you just need “POST a URL, get back a PNG,” you are paying for a lot of unused platform.
When Apify is the right choice
Apify is genuinely the best option for specific use cases:
- Large-scale scheduled crawling — tens of thousands of pages per day, automatically, with result datasets and monitoring
- Team collaboration — shared Actor runs, shared datasets, access controls across a scraping team
- Pre-built Actors from the Store — if a well-maintained Actor already does what you need, using it on Apify is faster than building from scratch
- Managed proxy rotation — Apify's proxy infrastructure handles IP rotation and anti-bot evasion at scale
Apify vs Openkova for screenshots
| Feature | Apify (screenshot Actor) | Openkova (self-hosted) |
|---|---|---|
| Screenshot via REST API | Via Actor HTTP trigger | ✓ Native POST endpoint |
| HTML snippet input | Depends on Actor | ✓ /api/convert/snippet |
| HTML file upload | ✗ | ✓ /api/convert/file |
| Self-hostable | ✗ cloud-only | ✓ |
| Private / internal URLs | ✗ | ✓ |
| Data stays on your servers | ✗ | ✓ |
| Pricing model | $49–199/mo + compute | Server cost only |
| Free tier | $5 credits/mo | Unlimited (self-hosted) |
| License | Proprietary platform | MIT |
| MCP server | ✗ | ✓ (@openkova/mcp) |
Apify vs Crawlee for scraping
If your use case is web crawling or data extraction rather than screenshot generation, the comparison changes. Crawlee — the open-source library Apify maintains — runs entirely locally at zero cost:
| Feature | Apify platform | Crawlee (local) |
|---|---|---|
| Runs locally | ✗ | ✓ |
| Managed scheduling | ✓ | ✗ (use cron) |
| Managed proxy rotation | ✓ | ✗ (bring your own) |
| Dataset storage | ✓ Apify datasets | Local disk / your DB |
| Team UI | ✓ | ✗ |
| License | Proprietary | Apache-2.0 |
| Cost | $39–199/mo + compute | Free |
For most individual developers and small teams, Crawlee locally covers the scraping use case at zero cost. The Apify platform adds value when you need managed infrastructure, scheduling, and team tooling.
Self-hosting a screenshot API instead
If your goal is “capture screenshots of URLs programmatically,” the simplest self-hosted setup is Openkova:
# Deploy Openkova with Docker
docker run -p 3000:3000 \
-e CHROMIUM_PATH=/usr/bin/chromium \
ghcr.io/scnix-git/openkova:latest
# Screenshot any URL
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/convert/url \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"url": "https://example.com", "format": "jpeg"}' \
--output screenshot.jpgNo Apify account. No compute credits. No data leaving your server.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a free self-hosted alternative to Apify?
For screenshots and HTML-to-image conversion, Openkova is MIT-licensed and freely self-hostable — no platform fee, no per-request charges. For web scraping and crawling, Crawlee (maintained by Apify, Apache-2.0) runs locally at no cost.
Can Apify be self-hosted?
No. The Apify platform is cloud-only. Crawlee, the open-source scraping framework Apify maintains, runs locally — but that is a library, not the managed platform. Openkova is MIT-licensed and fully self-hostable.
How does Apify pricing work for screenshots?
Apify uses two-layer pricing: a monthly platform fee ($49–$199/mo) plus per-Actor compute charges. Headless Chrome Actors — needed for screenshots — cost 10–20× more than lightweight Actors due to Chromium resource usage. At meaningful screenshot volumes, this becomes expensive quickly.
What is the difference between Apify and Openkova?
Apify is a managed cloud platform for large-scale scraping with scheduling, datasets, and team tooling. Openkova is a self-hosted REST API focused on screenshot and HTML-to-image conversion. If you need “POST a URL, get back a PNG,” Openkova is simpler, MIT-licensed, and costs nothing per request.
See also: Browserless alternatives, ScreenshotOne alternatives, and the screenshot API pricing comparison.